<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: More Social, Less Media	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.opensourcestrategies.com/2011/10/10/more-social-less-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.opensourcestrategies.com/2011/10/10/more-social-less-media/</link>
	<description>Commercial open source climate finance and investing with blockchain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:35:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Si Chen		</title>
		<link>https://www.opensourcestrategies.com/2011/10/10/more-social-less-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1013</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Si Chen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 21:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourcestrategies.com/?p=544#comment-1013</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.opensourcestrategies.com/2011/10/10/more-social-less-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1012&quot;&gt;Jim Intihar&lt;/a&gt;.

I think that is the right approach, and we should not overdo the &quot;measuring.&quot;. Every successful company, and I mean &quot;success&quot; in the strictest financial sense of earning an above market return on invested capital (ROIC), has historically depended on unmeasurable offline social interactions -- people talking about it with each other.  Social media has taken social interaction online.  Great.  But that shouldn&#039;t straightjacket us into thinking that it has to be measurable, when in fact it should just be second nature.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.opensourcestrategies.com/2011/10/10/more-social-less-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1012">Jim Intihar</a>.</p>
<p>I think that is the right approach, and we should not overdo the &#8220;measuring.&#8221;. Every successful company, and I mean &#8220;success&#8221; in the strictest financial sense of earning an above market return on invested capital (ROIC), has historically depended on unmeasurable offline social interactions &#8212; people talking about it with each other.  Social media has taken social interaction online.  Great.  But that shouldn&#8217;t straightjacket us into thinking that it has to be measurable, when in fact it should just be second nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Intihar		</title>
		<link>https://www.opensourcestrategies.com/2011/10/10/more-social-less-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1012</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Intihar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourcestrategies.com/?p=544#comment-1012</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find it extremely hard to measure social media for my business.  I mainly use it for a channel of communication to my customers, not necessarily a way to sell or market to them...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it extremely hard to measure social media for my business.  I mainly use it for a channel of communication to my customers, not necessarily a way to sell or market to them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
